Iraq War Essay

The the Statesn governing body took the controversial decisiveness of waging a offer of fight against Iraq. The spate and the motives of the Ameri trick government fate that the struggle on Iraq was un strugglefareranted and can non be unloose although the American government has put preliminary a few reasons for waging this war. The logic and manifest does not support such(prenominal) argumentations by the American government. The American government has failed to justify its unilateral decision of declaring war against Iraq.In the year 2002, the American chair revealed his architectural plan of feelering the Iraki regime as it was thought that Iraq was in the process of acclivitous as the greatest threat to the American aegis measure. This decision was app arntly taken on the basis of the intelligence information that the US government booked concerning Iraqs atomic program. However, it is fire to stigmatise that this intelligence information was unbroken sec ret until 2002. The major reason for this war was the terrorist attack of the World Trade amount of money in the year 2001.Obviously, this attack had left(a) Americans at a enunciate of rap as the successful terrorist attack exhibit to the whole humanness that American security is at stake and that American army and intelligence power is not that efficient. (Powers 1) The articulatio genus jerk reaction resulted in the decision to chalk out the proper plans to keep on the future attacks of the American territory. However, it is interesting to note that the American government could not amaze even the simple absolute majority of the members of the UN aegis Council.This clearly indicates that the United Nations did not wholeheartedly support the Iraqi venture initiated by the American government. The close allies such as France and Germ some(prenominal) could not be positive(p) of the ingest for this war project as these countries felt that there was no need for any fresh attack on the Iraqi territory as by and by 1991 this region was left in virtually depleted state. The President was able to just convince the United States sexual intercourse as the members of the Congress did not question the need of a war on Iraq.The Congress members did not even participate in the debate regarding the Iraqi war. This shows that the American government could not convince the world leadership that Iraq was up to some fresh hurt in the form of the production of armaments having the competency to destroy the world population. These details indicate that the American government has been alienated by other important powers which have not accepted the evidence presented by America that Iraq was emerging as another concenter of terrorist activities.(Powers 2) The master(prenominal) argument of the proponents of war was that ibn Talal ibn Talal Hussein Hussein have various precarious heavy limbs such as nuclear arsenals and chemical weapons which could ha ve been apply to destroy the adversary countries. The proponents of war take a firm stand that the past invoice of Saddam showed that he was an aggressor. Their another contention is that Saddam Hussein had connections with the Islamic terrorist organizations and the leaders such as Osama bin oppressed who had played an important role in the WTC attack.(Mearsheimer and Walt 1) These are the three reasons given up by war supporters to justify the US aggression on Iraq. However, the proponents of war are not able to prove that Hussein really possessed Weapons of Mass close (WMD). The UN inspections did not reveal that Iraq actually possessed or had the potential of building considerable base of WMD which could have been used for destructive purposes. The War mongers were aware of the concomitant that their action would lead to huge expenses to the American treasury and that this war would result in the alienation of America in the world politics.Even then they insisted that war was needful as one could not undergo to ignore the possession of nuclear arsenals in the hands of the Iraqi leadership. In reality, the US had the power to contain the alleged Iraqi aggression. The argument that war was inevitable rests on the faulty logic. The war supporters are not able to accompany up with potent proof to suggest that Saddam had sternly pursued the plan of destroying his enemy countries. (Mearsheimer and Walt 4)However, in this context one should remember that afterward the Gulf war the allied forces had obtained foundation into Iraq and they had used their energy to reduce the military machine power of Iraq. The Gulf war tanning was sufficient to deplete the Iraqi resources. possibly the American government require to force a strong statement against Islamic terrorists after the September 11 attack. This resulted in the declaration of war on Iraq. This can be considered as the face salve attempt do by the American government.The newspapers have composinged information from CIA documents which contradicted the statements made by the President Bush who asserted that Iraq was trying to produce nuclear arsenals as the Iraqi officials had approached South Africa to obtain materials needed for producing nuclear weapons. However, CIA expressed doubt regarding this report that Iraq was trying to obtain nuclear weapon materials from South Africa. Another contention of the President was that the Iraqi officials refused entry of the weapon inspectors into Iraqi regions. However, there are evidences which refute this allegation.In reality, as the newspapers reported, the Iraqi government had offered their cooperation with the weapon inspectors. There is to a fault evidence to suggest that even before the beginning of war the American government obtained the information that Iraq did not approach South Africa to obtain nuclear weapon materials. This shows that the Bush administration had designedly misinterpreted the intelligence re ports in order to obtain the support of the Congress members for this war. In spitefulness of these contradictions Bush has defended his action of invading Iraq without any major reason. (Priest and Milbank A01)There are evidences to state that the US decision to attack Iraq has backfired and it has not chaird to the improvement of the US consider in the international political arena. The Iraq venture has resulted in the protest by the governments and people belong to different nations in the world which did not find any necessity for this war. (Martin 3) The main reason for this protest against the war is that this war was unjust. The extreme action taken by the US forces against the innocent Iraqi civilians has come under popular criticism. This shows the world public opinion has not supported the nous of the US led campaign against Iraq.This war has enraged the Muslim nations and this may contribute to increase in the activities of the Muslim terrorist organizations leading to the loss of lives in different part of the world. There is no evidence to state that the US government obtained the support of the majority of the Americans for this war. The Iraq war has contributed to the creation negative image of Bush not only in the world politics but also in the US. In this sense, this war has not benefited the US people. Instead of increasing the security of Americans, this war has increased the possibility of terrorist attack on the innocent American population. (Martin 4) kit and boodle CitedBracknell, Major Rob. Euro-bashing as Good turn. Naval War College Review. 58. 2, (2005) 139-142. Available at https//www.brookings.edu/